MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544957624

Open-drop anesthesia for small laboratory animals.

2012· article· en· W1544957624 on OpenAlexaff
Tara E. Risling, Nigel Caulkett, Darrel Florence

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal testing and alternatives
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsofluraneIntoxicative inhalantSevofluraneAnestheticAnesthesiaChemistryGas analyzerDrop (telecommunication)Volatile anestheticChromatographyMedicineToxicologyEnvironmental chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the effect of temperature on volatile concentrations of 2 inhalant anesthetics, isoflurane (ISO) and sevoflurane (SEVO), delivered via open-drop technique, as well as the characteristics of induction and recovery using the open-drop method in mice. Testing revealed that temperature had no effect on the volatile concentration of either ISO or SEVO. However, it was determined that open-drop delivery of ISO or SEVO is a viable means of anesthetizing mice under certain conditions. The volatile concentration required to induce anesthesia in mice following the application of 0.5 mL of anesthetic in an induction chamber of 725 mL volume at 87.6 kPa and 20°C was measured with a precision gas analyzer. For ISO, anesthesia was induced at concentrations of 6.80 ± 0.57% [mean ± standard deviation (s)] after 35.70 ± 6.95 s (n = 10), while SEVO induction took significantly longer (45.50 ± 9.96 s) and required higher volatile concentrations [7.41 ± 0.57% (n = 10)]. The animals recovered rapidly from both ISO and SEVO-based induction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.311
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.067 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAnimal testing and alternativesFrench-language works237,207