MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545002229 · doi:10.1029/2004gc000748

Coupled crust‐mantle dynamics and intraplate tectonics: Two‐dimensional numerical and three‐dimensional analogue modeling

2004· article· en· W1545002229 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCrustLithosphereMantle (geology)Crustal recyclingIntraplate earthquakeGeophysicsMantle convectionAsthenospherePetrologyCratonInstabilityTectonicsSeismologyContinental crustMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tectonic deformation of some intraplate regions may be caused by the Rayleigh‐Taylor (RT) instability of dense subcrustal lithosphere (mantle lithosphere) as it descends into the mantle. We report on a series of scaled three‐dimensional (3‐D) analogue and 2‐D numerical experiments of coupled crust‐mantle dynamics that study such a process. The models investigate the effects of two geometries of RT instability (linear versus axisymmetric) and use different rheological stratifications of the crust. The growth of the RT instability is strongly influenced by crustal rheology. While RT growth rates are not greatly influenced by the geometry of the mantle lithosphere instability itself, the surface is. Experiments having a viscous‐only crust are characterized by significant crustal contraction and thickening above the mantle downwelling and extension and thinning in adjacent regions. In experiments with a brittle upper crust the surface deformation is much more subdued. However, strong mantle flow‐induced deformation still occurs in the ductile lower crust beneath the quiescent brittle upper crust. When the lower crust is relatively strong, localized styles of extensional and contractional structure develop in the brittle upper crust owing to the greater degree of coupling between upper crust and the mantle instability. In all the experiments, a portion of the ductile lower crustal material is entrained within the downgoing RT instability deep into the mantle. The interplay between dynamic topography and crustal thickening/thinning induced by the underlying mantle flow governs various time‐dependent phases of subsidence and uplift of the model surface. The experiments help to account for a number of first‐order tectonic behaviors of the lithospheres of Earth and other terrestrial planets. For example, intraplate orogens and basins, complex localized tectonic structure in intraplate settings, and deep crustal seismic fabrics may arise as the variable crustal response to underlying mantle lithosphere RT instabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it