Deep chlorophyll maxima and UVR acclimation by epilimnetic phytoplankton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. It is well established that ultraviolet radiation (UVR) has many harmful effects on phytoplankton, but the factors controlling algal sensitivity to UVR are not fully understood. 2. We exposed phytoplankton communities from the epilimnia and deep chlorophyll maxima (DCM) of 2 Canadian lakes to 14 irradiance treatments of various spectral quality and monitored changes in the maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II photochemistry (Fv/Fm) using a pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer. 3. Phytoplankton from DCM did not show marked differences from epilimnetic communities in taxonomy or nutrient status, but exhibited substantially higher photosynthetic impairment under UVR exposure. 4. Our results suggest that epilimnetic phytoplankton acclimate to in situ light conditions in a spectrally-specific manner, and that ultraviolet-A radiation is a stronger stressor than ultraviolet-B or photosynthetically active radiation in the mixed layers of our study lakes. Model estimates of damage and recovery rate constants revealed that the phytoplankton of the two lakes relied upon different strategies of UVR-acclimation, in one lake minimising susceptibility to photodamage and in the other maximising recovery efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".