MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545064199 · doi:10.1023/a:1005694320063

Features of carnitine palmitoyltransferase type I deficiency

2001· article· en· W1545064199 on OpenAlexaff
S. E. Olpin, Jason D. Allen, James R. Bonham, S. Clark, Peter T. Clayton, J Calvin, M. Downing, Kevin Ives, S. Jones, N. J. Manning, R. J. Pollitt, Susan Standing, M S Tanner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inherited Metabolic Disease · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsNewborn Screening Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene isoformEndocrinologyInternal medicineCarnitine O-palmitoyltransferaseIsozymeCarnitineMyopathySkeletal muscleCarnitine palmitoyltransferase ICreatine kinaseKidneyBiologyBeta oxidationMedicineEnzymeBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carnitine palmitoyltransferase type I (CPT I) is unique among long-chain fatty acid oxidation enzymes in that there are two tissue-specific isoforms, 'hepatic' and 'muscle', which are encoded by two separate genes. The 'hepatic' isoform is expressed in liver, kidney and fibroblasts and at low levels in the heart, while the other isoform occurs in skeletal muscle and is the predominant form in heart. Reported patients with CPT I deficiency lack activity of the hepatic isoform and present before 30 months of age with hypoketotic hypoglycaemia, hepatomegaly with raised transaminases, seizures and coma. We discuss four new cases in three families showing, variously, renal tubular acidosis, transient hyperlipidaemia and, paradoxically, myopathy with elevated creatinine kinase or cardiac involvement in the neonatal period as additional features that deserve wider recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inherited Metabolic DiseaseSame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207