MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545235196 · doi:10.7202/038120ar

La colonisation des milieux humides en Nouvelle-France : le point de vue de l’archéologie

2009· article· fr· W1545235196 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marcel Moussette

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyForestryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En examinant divers établissement de colonisation dans des zones humides de l’Acadie, du Canada et de la vallée du Mississipi aux XVII e et XVIII e siècles, l’auteur se propose de rendre compte des stratégies de subsistance utilisées par les colons et des relations de ces derniers à ces environnements particuliers. Le choix des sites étudiés est fait de façon à présenter, autant que possible, un éventail des zones humides différentes, menant à des discussions et comparaisons intersites : Belle-Isle en Acadie, dans le marais d’eau salée du littoral atlantique; l’Île aux Oies, au Canada, dans le marais d’eau saumâtre de l’estuaire moyen du Saint-Laurent; La Prairie en Canada, dans la plaine de débordement du tronçon fluvial du Saint-Laurent; et Cahokia in Pays des Illinois, dans la plaine de débordement du tronçon fluvial du Mississipi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207