MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545337728 · doi:10.5751/es-01287-100133

Open Source and Open Content: a Framework for Global Collaboration in Social-Ecological Research

2005· article· en· W1545337728 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles M. Schweik, Tom Evans, J. Morgan Grove

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Source Software Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of AgricultureU.S. Forest ServiceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOpen sourceOpen scienceEnvironmental resource managementEcologyContent (measure theory)Open dataComputer scienceGeographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schweik, C., T. Evans, and J. Grove. 2005. Open source and open content: a framework for global collaboration in social-ecological research. Ecology and Society 10(1): 33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01287-100133

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.082
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.084
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0820.084
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0180.016
Science and technology studies0.0100.045
Scholarly communication0.0260.045
Open science0.0060.025
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and SocietySame topicOpen Source Software InnovationsFrench-language works237,207