MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545343273 · doi:10.1109/fpt.2003.1275747

A high-speed ray tracing engine built on a field-programmable system

2004· article· en· W1545343273 on OpenAlexaff
J. Fender, Jonathan Rose

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersXilinx
KeywordsPentiumField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceRay tracing (physics)Rendering (computer graphics)VirtexSoftwareTracingComputer hardwareEmbedded systemComputer graphics (images)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ray tracing is a method of rendering high-quality images and video by calculating what happens to virtual light rays in a 3-dimensional scene. It is capable of creating for more realism than traditional Z-buffering methods. This paper describes the design of a hardware ray tracing system implemented on a multi-FPGA Xilinx Virtex-E prototyping system. The result is a hardware ray tracer that is capable of out-performing a 2.4GHz Pentium 4, running a well-known high performance software ray tracing algorithm, by up to a factor of thirty. When these results are projected forward into a next generation FPGA system, consisting of a single large Virtex 2 Pro FPGA, it is found that the system should be able to out perform the same Pentium 4 by up to two orders of magnitude, and the fastest known hardware implementation, the AR350, by up to a factor of three.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207