MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545431910

First Wave Wisdom for the Third Wave World

2008· article· en· W1545431910 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThirdspace · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThird waveMulticulturalismFeminismSociologyIdentity (music)Plan (archaeology)Gender studiesAestheticsHistoryArtPedagogyPolitical economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In redefining the feminist agenda, lessons from history provide a plan for future feminist projects. First wave womenA¢â‚¬â„¢s rights reformers strove to define their mission in terms of authentic values, emphasizing peace, community, and spiritual connection in constructing feminist identity. Given the hostile and often soulless environment in which we live today, authentic values are again important to reclaiming and actively constructing feminismA¢â‚¬â„¢s mission and image. While first wave feminism restricted its membership to women of Anglo heritage, current models of incorporation, such as multiculturalism, provide contemporary tools for successfully addressing the problems of exclusion of the past. By reconnecting the third wave endeavor to its first wave predecessor, feminists today can arrive at meaningful answers to concerns that have surrounded the womanA¢â‚¬â„¢s project since its inception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it