Authentic identity : the essence of how successful ecopreneurs communicate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis employed qualitative methods including grounded theory to assess how successful\necopreneurs communicate to maintain and sustain their triple bottom line organizations. The\nanalysis of transcribed interviews from 13 exemplars in North America revealed five groups of\ncommon attributes that form an overarching theme of authentic identity. This finding confirms\nthe Communication Theory of Identity and furthers it because it is through authentic identity that\nsuccessful ecopreneurs manage to narrow identity gaps across the four layers of identity: they\ncontinuously strive for alignment with themselves, in relationships, among and across\nstakeholder groups, and in their daily execution. Understanding ecopreneurs and their practices,\ndistilling recommendations, and adding to the scarce body of academic literature on\necopreneurship, are critical because ecopreneurship, in light of the alarming economic and\nenvironmental outlook, is establishing itself as a considerable area of business activity and\ninfluence for social change and a sustainable future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it