MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545457196 · doi:10.4271/2005-01-1255

Friction Stir Spot Welding of Aluminum and Magnesium Alloy Sheets

2005· article· en· W1545457196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpot weldingAluminiumMaterials scienceMagnesiumMetallurgyWeldingFriction stir weldingMagnesium alloyAlloy5052 aluminium alloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper demonstrates the application of a displacement controlled friction stir spot welding machine in joining 1.5 mm sheets of Al 5754 aluminum and AM60 base materials. Higher fracture loads during overlap shear testing were produced when the projected bonded area immediately adjacent to the keyhole periphery and the energy input during FSW spot welding increased. Partial pull-out of the stir zone occurred in high energy input FSW spot welds with fracture initiating from unbonded regions located on either side of the welded joint.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">FSW welding tools contaminated with magnesium had a markedly detrimental effect on the mechanical properties of Al 5754 spot welds. Mg-contamination decreased the energy input and the dimensions of the projected bonded area, and produced regions immediately adjacent to the keyhole periphery in Al 5754 spot welds, which contained brittle intermingled lamellae.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it