MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1545816526 · doi:10.1177/1077699013506353

Book Review: <i>Pacific Citizens: Larry and Guyo Tajiri and Japanese American Journalism in the World War II Era</i> , by Greg Robinson

2013· article· en· W1545816526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael S. Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperWifeSpanish Civil WarJournalismWorld War IIMedia studiesHistoryLeaguePraiseLawPolitical scienceEconomic historySociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pacific Citizens: Larry and Guyo Tajiri and Japanese American Journalism in the World War II Era. Greg Robinson, ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2012. 344 pp. $60 hbk.Studies of the Japanese American press during the war have tended to focus on news- papers published in the concentration camps set up by President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066, which forcibly evacuated citizens of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast. Greg Robinson's book fills a gap in the historical record by examining the main Japanese American newspaper published outside the camps. Thriving Japanese American papers along the West Coast, home to 90% of Japanese Americans, shut down as relocation took away subscribers and staffs. Four papers continued to publish during the war in the Rocky Mountains, east of the exclusion zone. Of those, the Pacific Citizen, with its national circulation base of 7,000, was by far the largest. It moved from California, where it began as the newsletter of the Japanese American Citizens League, to Salt Lake City, Utah. Journalist Larry Tajiri and his wife, Guyo, agreed to put out a real newspaper, starting at first as a weekly and converting to biweekly. They worked on a shoestring budget, operating as the paper's sole journal- ists. They reported on issues of interest to Japanese Americans, including military service, camp riots, and civil liberties. In so doing, they earned high praise from Office of War Information Director Elmer Davis, who called Pacific Citizen the best weekly in America.Historians interested in the mainstream Japanese American journalism of the war can thank University of Quebec history professor Robinson for compiling and editing significant works of the Tajiris and opening a window to an American minority's response to troubled times. The newspaper remains the best single source for news for and about Japanese Americans during World War II.That this newspaper, or any Japanese publication, could exist during World War II remained an open question for several months after December 1941. Federal officials fretted about the possible security threats posed by newspapers published by citizens whose ancestors came from Axis countries. One option was to shutter them for the duration, another was to keep them open but impose censorship, and a third was to let them publish but monitor their content. Larry Tajiri argued for the third case in a 1942 letter to Alan Cranston, a bureaucrat in the Office of Facts and Figures and, much later in life, a U.S. senator from California. Japanese Americans needed their own press, Tajiri said. People left in the dark are less likely to maintain a proper perspective and hence are more susceptible to be influenced by rumor and inimical gossip, he said in the letter, which the book reprints. In addition, the educational function of the press could prepare Japanese Americans to support democratic and liberal ideas.Chapters cover Larry Tajiri's prewar writings, wartime columns and editorials, writings that appeared in mainstream publications, wartime letters, postwar writings, and selections from his career after leaving Pacific Citizen in 1952. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207