Bibliographic record
Abstract
La santé de travailleurs peut se trouver irrémédiablement et directement compromise en raison de la pénibilité de certains métiers et/ou fonctions. La réglementation de la pénibilité au travail emprunte à cet égard plusieurs voies. Un retrait du marché du travail de manière progressive ou anticipée peut tout d’abord être envisagé. L’attribution de compensations financières au salarié ayant exercé ou continuant d’être employé dans un milieu pénible est également envisageable. L’obligation légale de reclassement existant en matière d’inaptitude est par ailleurs un autre dispositif pouvant permettre l’aménagement de la relation contractuelle de travail et ce faisant, compenser les conséquences de la pénibilité. Néanmoins, au-delà de ces différentes possibilités, l’amélioration des conditions de travail fondée sur une logique de prévention apparaît comme la seule alternative permettant de prendre en compte la pénibilité et donc de limiter l’impact de certains environnements de travail sur la santé des personnes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".