MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546029854 · doi:10.7202/1012346ar

La relation musique-danse dans le genre du ballet au Mali : organisation, évolution et émancipation

2012· article· fr· W1546029854 on OpenAlex
Élina Djebbari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesBalletDanceVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendant longtemps, la danse dite « africaine » a été considérée comme une expression corporelle que l’on ne pouvait distinguer du « tam-tam », censé l’accompagner à tout moment. Depuis sa création après l’indépendance en 1960, le Ballet national du Mali a contribué à donner du sens à ce stéréotype en faisant du tambour jembe l’instrument-roi de ce genre musico-chorégraphique. Cet article propose de nous interroger sur les techniques musicales et chorégraphiques qui permettent l’interaction musique-danse lors de la performance scénique, sur les rapports de hiérarchie qui s’en dégagent, la façon dont ces valeurs peuvent s’inverser ou se transformer selon les contextes et les pratiques et, enfin, d’appréhender comment la création artistique contemporaine de ce genre musico-chorégraphique semble pouvoir s’orienter vers une dissociation de ces deux éléments alors que leur complémentarité en déterminait justement la caractéristique principale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it