MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546207124 · doi:10.1063/1.1588369

InAs/InP quantum dots in SiO2/Ta2O5-based microcavities

2003· article· en· W1546207124 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Dalacu, Daniel Poitras, J. Lefebvre, Philip J. Poole, G. C. Aers, Robin L. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser linewidthQuantum dotWetting layerMaterials sciencePlanarGallium arsenideSaturation (graph theory)OptoelectronicsCondensed matter physicsPolarization (electrochemistry)StopbandLasing thresholdQuantum wellOpticsAtomic physicsPhysicsLaserChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planar InAs/InP quantum-dot microcavities using multilayer SiO2/Ta2O5 Bragg reflectors have been studied in emission. For an eight-pair mirror design, the stop band extends from 700 to 900 meV and the cavity linewidth is ∼500 μeV for emission at 850 meV. Measurements as a function of incident power show quantum-dot saturation behavior, with the emission intensity going to the wetting layer outside the cavity stop band. Saturation behavior at fixed pump power is also observed as a function of decreasing temperature. Dispersion measurements as a function of emission angle show polarization splitting in reasonable agreement with theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207