Origin of Anastomosis in the Upper Columbia River, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To understand the origin of anastomosis on the Columbia River between Spillimacheen and Golden, British Columbia, Canada, a geomorphological and sedimentological survey was undertaken during the summer flood of 2000. On the basis of these observations, the study reach can be divided into two subreaches: a highly anastomosed section with three to five channels, and a weakly anastomosed section with one to two channels. The highly anastomosed reach occurs immediately downstream from the Spillimacheen tributary and is characterized by a higher channel slope, a higher number of crevasse splays, a larger combined crevasse splay area, a wider valley and a coarser bedload. Higher rates of floodplain aggradation in the highly anastomosed reach are suggested by modern sediment budgets and radiocarbon dates. These geomorphological and sedimentary associations are consistent with the hypothesis that anastomosis of the Columbia River is maintained by a dynamic equilibrium between the rates of channel creation and channel abandonment. Rising base-level, fine bedload and low bed-slope are not necessary immediate conditions for anastomosis of the Columbia River.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".