MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546269820

The current state of noise requirements for federal environmental assessment purposes

2004· article· en· W1546269820 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R.L. Scott Penton, Peter VanDelden, David Chadder

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsRowan Williams Davies & Irwin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Environmental noiseProcess (computing)Environmental impact assessmentCurrent (fluid)Environmental planningState (computer science)Environmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current state of noise requirements for federal environmental assessment purposes is discussed. The variations in provincial/territorial noise guidelines means that projects with similar potential to cause adverse effects are dealt with in widely different manners depending on the location and type of facility. Of particular concern are noise impacts within remote rural areas, particularly in the far north. A common review process and national standard for assessing noise impacts in remote areas, similar to the Alberta Energy Utilities Board (EUB) approach are adopted. The guideline would apply to the facility under review only and would be applicable to all fixed industrial activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207