Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir des principales œuvres de Lucien Goldmann, décédé en octobre 1970 à Paris, Gilbert Tarrab tente dans cet article de montrer l'importante contribution de cet auteur prolifique en matière de sociologie de la littérature et du théâtre. Goldmann a en effet introduit le premier les concepts - qu'il a essayé sa vie durant de rendre opératoires - de " catégorie mentale ", de " cohérence interne d'une œuvre ", de " vision du monde ", de " structure génétique ", notamment. Tous ses écrits tentent en vérité de trouver la structure englobante (sociologique et historique à la fois) dans laquelle seraient insérées les structures internes de l'œuvre étudiée, dans une époque sociale déterminée. Ses analyses procèdent de deux mouvements primordiaux : comprendre l'œuvre (examiner ses structures internes) et l'expliquer (comment l'œuvre s'insère dans la structure socio-économique globalisante). C'est cette dialectique et cette logique que l'auteur de cet article a voulu dégager avec le plus de clarté possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".