MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546375592 · doi:10.5539/res.v7n11p89

Continuous Vocational Education of Employees in Conditions of Knowledge Economy: European Trends and Prospects of Ukraine

2015· article· en· W1546375592 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Оlena Iastremska, Мaryna Мartynеnko

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationUkrainianKnowledge economyEuropean unionBusinessLifelong learningMember statesDivision of labourEconomic growthEconomic systemPolitical scienceEconomyEconomicsMarket economyEconomic policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the current trends in the world is formation of knowledge-based economies. A significant role in this process plays continuous vocational education and training of employees of enterprises as the main economic actors. The results of correlation analysis presented in the paper confirm the importance of on-the-job training and its interconnections with development of knowledge-based economy, competitiveness of the country and its economic growth. Considering Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union it is advisable to pay special attention to the peculiarities of vocational education and training in EU Member States. The complex study of the relationship between lifelong learning, on-the-job training, employment, development of the knowledge economy, economic growth and competitiveness within each country allows to divide the countries into two groups. This division was implemented according to correlation ties between the selected indicators. Taking into account the limited amount of funds spent on vocational education and training of employees at Ukrainian enterprises it is suggested to focus on creating organisational conditions for stimulating the development of self-education and professional self-improvement of employees. The establishment of the systems of organisational knowledge at enterprises is considered as the foundation for the development of such conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of European StudiesSame topicCompetency Development and EvaluationFrench-language works237,207