MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1546414402 · doi:10.1353/lac.2004.0062

Guide to the Collections, Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center (review)

2004· article· en· W1546414402 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert L. Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueLibraries & culture · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRansomArt historyHistoryArtReading (process)White (mutation)Quarter (Canadian coin)Library scienceHumanitiesClassicsArchaeologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Guide to the Collections, Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center Robert L. Dawson Guide to the Collections, Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center. Edited by Margaret J. Barker. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Harry Ransom Center, 2003. 157 pp. $12.00. Published to coincide with the opening of the new reading room and galleries, the Guide to the Collections of the Harry Ransom Center (HRC) is a comprehensive narrative describing in considerable detail the wide range of materials housed in one of the most important research libraries in the United States, indeed, the world. A glance at the table of contents reveals the various areas of interest, from American studies, architecture, art and art history, through gay studies, music, Texana, women's studies, and more. At the end are a few pages devoted to "Special [End Page 344] Collections: Personal Effects, Decorative Arts and Special Rooms," followed by explanations about using the HRC, programs and fellowships, a useful bibliography, and a thorough index. There are numerous illustrations (color and black-and-white), largely reflecting the twentieth century, mirroring the direction taken by the HRC under the able leadership of Dr. Thomas Staley during nearly a quarter of a century (1980 to the present). There are so many treasures in the HRC that it is impossible even to highlight them in a page or two. During the more than quarter century that I have been at the University of Texas (the most assiduous of the many readers at the HRC, I might add), I have seen many changes and a steady stream of new acquisitions, from a copy of the Gutenberg Bible through the David Selznick archives. When I wanted to show a class one of the costumes from Gone with the Wind, I was asked, for reasons relating to conservation, to pick something else. So the students got to examine a dress worn by Joan Crawford in her 1945 comeback film, Mildred Pierce, for which she won the Academy Award for best actress. Since I am a specialist in eighteenth-century studies (especially French), I would like to present a few reflections about what can be found in the HRC in that domain. First of all, the HRC has been one of the more important contributors to the English Short-Title Catalog (ESTC) database, which, originally limited to the eighteenth century (as the Eighteenth-Century Short-Title Catalog), now covers a period extending from the origins of printing in England to 1801. Aside from the wealth of early material relating to the scope of the ESTC, the scholar will find one of the most important Voltaire collections in the Americas. One of the beauties of the collection is that it was formed in England (by Desmond Flower) and thus contains a wide range of British eighteenth-century Voltaire editions in French (usually with false imprints) absent from, for example, the magnificent collection of such materials in the National Library of France. As I read through the Guide, I came across a reference to the Affair of the Queen's Necklace. (In a nutshell, Marie-Antoinette refused to purchase what was surely the most important diamond necklace ever assembled. It was swindled from the jewelers who had made the offer. A cardinal—and prince of the blood—was arrested at court; there was a trial with far-reaching consequences. The affair did much to undermine the prestige of the royal family, especially the queen's, and, in more than one way, it helped usher in revolution.) I knew about the various briefs and engravings relating to the affair housed in the HRC, but I did not know that the printed materials are complemented by a highly important manuscript subcollection (as yet uncataloged). There are letters and documents concerning nearly all of the principals in the affair, providing behind-the-scenes insights at crucial moments. There are lists of just who went to visit the Cardinal de Rohan in the fortress of the Bastille; original police interrogations of the cardinal and of Mme de La Motte-Valois (a chief crook), signed by the accused; letters by the infamous Cagliostro; and much more. Were this material put up for sale in France...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibraries & cultureSame topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207