Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mark Miller presented "Core Values in Catholic Health Care: Mission, Ethics, Stewardship" as an introduction to the topic of the Catholic presence in modern health care.He noted how the present-day financial crises in health care have forced Catholic facilities to explore their history in order to understand what role they ought to play in an increasingly business-oriented atmosphere.The historic call to fulfill the healing ministry of Jesus Christ in looking after the poor, the disenfranchised and the marginalized presents challenges analogous to those faced by the pioneers.Second, a particular focus on ethics in health care ought to be part of the Catholic mission.Ethics, although it means many things in a pluralistic society, is becoming the common language around values and choices in health care.Catholic ethicists need to be part of the conversation-which is pluralist in nature and not secular, as some philosophically based bioethicists would suggest-and to make ethics a regular part of the conversation and choices within our facilities and programs.Ethical aspects of treatment decisions need to be complemented by ethical reflection by boards and administration, in resource allocation, treatment of employees, etc.Finally, as health care is a huge business today, the financial implications of Catholic health care require a very serious examination of the use of our resources (financial, personnel, time, etc.) in a system that is often pushed by technological and drug costs to the detriment of "basic" health care (a concept that is notoriously hard to define).Stewardship primarily implies responsibility to the mission.Regina Wolfe, in "The Mission of Catholic Health Care: Facing the Challenges," then continued by presenting a broad picture of the enormous numbers of ethical issues that we are currently facing in health care: Initial and ongoing education in mission at all levels of our facilities and involvement; hiring staff committed to the mission; responding to the market forces presently changing the face of health care; and coming to terms with the movement from
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".