Perbandingan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1992 tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan dengan Rancangan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several weaknesses of UU LLAJ. The first weakness is related to centralistic approach used in the UU. Second, the content of the UU has not yet been adjusted with several related new regulations. Third, it has not yet integrate land, marine and air transport. Forth, there are overlaps among related institutions on their rights and responsibilities. Fifth, it has not yet accommodated low-cost and efficient public services. RUU LLAJ, on the other hand, is drafted to elucidate the weaknesses of UU LLAJ. Some changes regulated on RUU LLAJ are regarding decentralization approach, new type of license and new authority on issuing license, and the integration of land, marine and air transport. Furthermore, the RUU LLAJ regulates public participation which has not yet regulated in UU LLAJ. Some of the changes are positive. However, the changes regarding the license system could increase public burden and could cause public confusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it