Francis Gingras (dir.). <em>Une étrange constance. Les motifs merveilleux dans les littératures d’expression française du Moyen Âge à nos jours</em>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regards sur la merveille L'ouvrage collectif édité par Francis Gingras, professeur agrégé au Département de littératures de langue française de l'Université de Montréal, est une collection d'articles portant sur les motifs du merveilleux ou, plus précisément, de la merveille dans la littérature du Moyen Âge jusqu'à nos jours.Il s'agit des actes d'un colloque qui, tenu à l'Université de Western Ontario en octobre 2002, se proposait de mettre en présence différentes approches du merveilleux à travers la trame de genres littéraires comme le théâtre, les contes, les romans ainsi qu'à travers les siècles et les littératures de toute la francophonie.La gamme des articles est donc assez large et variée, ce qui, d'une part, apporte de la richesse au recueil, mais d'autre part, provoque un certain manque de cohérence interne, le seul lien étant la thématique du merveilleux qui se tisse à travers les contributions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.085 | 0.063 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".