Bibliographic record
Abstract
Daniel Danis, après une série impressionnante de pièces tout au long de la décennie 1993-2003, amorce un virage majeur au milieu des années 2000 en poursuivant un programme exploratoire de formes scéniques audacieuses et souvent déroutantes. L’analyse, ici, porte sur le contexte théâtral au seuil du nouveau millénaire et sur le devenir scénique d’un auteur dramatique dès lors qu’il prend les commandes du plateau. C’est le statut même du texte qui s’en trouve relativisé — mais non évacué —, alors que s’offre à l’écrivain de plateau plusieurs langages, notamment audiovisuel et scénographique, sans oublier la gestuelle et la profération des acteurs, pour ne pas dire des performeurs. Émerge ainsi un imaginaire radicalement sensoriel, qui renonce à élaborer une fable pleine au profit d’un paysage mental, livré aux associations libres du spectateur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".