Changing the Picture: Youth, Gender and HIV / AIDS Prevention Campaigns in South Africa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The award-winning documentary Unwanted Images (director Monica Mak 2000) which contains drawings of gender-based violence as seen through the eyes of school children in South Africa often shocks adult viewers (both in South Africa and elsewhere) and evokes many questions including one of amazement – “Did children really draw these pictures?” The viewers are not so much contesting the authenticity of authorship as incredulity that it is within the imaginative experience of children to produce such images. Even the drawings themselves seem to be raising this question as we see in Figure 1.1 where the image is a child covering her eyes. The drawings however merely reinforce the alarming statistics revealed in the recent Human Rights Watch Report “Scared at School” released in March 2001. This report which drew on extensive interviews with teachers school officials and an analysis of newspaper and others news reports revealed that girls and young women in South African schools are prime targets for sexual violence in the context of date rape male teachers as predators gang rape and so on (note 1). These images in drawing attention to the prominence of sex-based violence in the lives of ordinary school children in South Africa point to the moral imperative of addressing the inescapable connection between such violence and the high incidence of HIV and AIDS amongst girls and women. Given that these are the images that many children are seeing experiencing and drawing we need to explore what can be done to make use of this knowledge that they are growing up with --- as part of new AIDS awareness campaigns. (excerpt)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Qualitative | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Qualitative | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it