MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1547154928 · doi:10.5771/9783845259123

International Handbook on Unfair Competition

2013· book· en· W1547154928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNomos eBooks · 2013
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Contract Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)BiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table of Contents A) General 1 What is Unfair Competition? 2 International Protection Against Unfair Competition 3 Regional Protection Against Unfair Competition B) Country Reports 1 Australia 2 Austria 3 Brazil 4 Canada 5 China 6 France 7 Germany 8 Hungary 9 India 10 Italy 11 Japan 12 Lithuania 13 Netherlands 14 Poland 15 Spain 16 South Africa 17 Sweden 18 Switzerland 19 Turkey 20 UK 21 USA C) Outlook

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.069

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNomos eBooksSame topicEuropean and International Contract LawFrench-language works237,207