Light-Trap Catch of Caddishflies (Trichoptera) in the Carpathian Basin and Anatolia in the Four Quarert of the Moon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study deals with the effect of Moon on light trapping of caddisflies (Trichoptera) species. The light-traps have operated in the following years: 1980, 1981, 1982, 1984, 1988, 1992 and 2000 at seven Hungarian sampling sites. Diken and Boyaci (2008) operated light-traps in year 2004 at Egirdir Lake (Turkey). We analysed of eleven species from four families in Hungary and eight species belonging to four families in Turkey. Relative catch values, calculated from daily catching data, were calculated by the four moon quarters: New Moon, First Quarter, Full Moon and Last Quarter. The significant catch maxima of different species in different moon quarters can be found. We could investigate only those species which were caught in great number by traps. Our results confirm that the Moon affects the lives of caddisflies (Trichoptera) and this fact is important in reproduction of caddisflies, taxonomy studies, protection of aquatic habitats and nature conservation research as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".