MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1547202551 · doi:10.1002/9780470084984.ch9

The Interpretation of EPR Parameters

2006· other· en· W1547202551 on OpenAlexaff
John A. Weil, James R. Bolton

Bibliographic record

VenueElectron paramagnetic resonance · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicalElectron paramagnetic resonanceInterpretation (philosophy)Reading (process)Molecular orbitalChemistryComputational chemistryTheoretical physicsChemical physicsPhysicsNuclear magnetic resonancePhilosophyOrganic chemistryMoleculeLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction π-Type Organic Radicals σ-Type Organic Radicals Triplet States and Biradicals Inorganic Radicals Electrically Conducting Systems Techniques for Structural Estimates from EPR Data References Notes Further Reading Problems Appendix 9A Hückel Molecular-Orbital Calculations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectron paramagnetic resonanceSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207