MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1547281946

SMEs in Sultanate of Oman: Meeting the Development Challenges

2012· article· en· W1547281946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dr.Ayoob C.P, balakrishnan somasundaram

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal of Economics & Business Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in MENA
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceBusinessEntrepreneurshipDeveloping countrySmall and medium-sized enterprisesEconomic growthEconomicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The small and medium enterprises (SMEs) not only play an important role in the economy of a country but are crucial to the country’s economic stability. In most countries SMEs generate a substantial share of GDP and a key source of new jobs as well as breeding ground for entrepreneurship and new business ideas. The United States of America, UK, Japan, Australia, Newzland, Canada and other developed, as well as developing countries are making policies to facilitate the growth of SMEs. In New Zealand SMEs makeup more than 99% of all business and account for about 60% of employment. In the USA more than half of all the employment comes from firms with fewer than 500 employees (Baldwin et al 2001 ). In the UK, SMEs employ 67% of the workforce (Lange et al 2000 ). Estimates from the World Bank indicates that SMEs have contributed over 55% of GDP in OECD countries and between 60 to 70 per cent of GDP in middle income and low income countries generating 60 to 70 percent employment ( Oman Economic Review, 2007 ). The above facts show that SMEs play a very important role in the growth of economy of a country, and Oman is not an exception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.323
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Journal of Economics & Business StudiesSame topicSocioeconomic Development in MENAFrench-language works237,207