Représentations de soi et positionnement social chez les membres de l’association familles de détenus-disparus à Santiago
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine les representations de soi liees au passe chez les familles de detenus-disparus et leur influence a la fois sur les identites contemporaines des individus et leur positionnement social actuel. En utilisant le cas du Chili post-dictatorial, il met en exergue la facon dont les disparitions forcees continuent d’influencer les identites contemporaines des proches de detenus-disparus. En discutant des differentes identites presentes dans ce groupe, cet article met en lumiere comment certains membres de l’association se representent unilateralement comme des actrices luttant pour les droits humains alors que d’autres se concoivent comme les victimes d’un regime autoritaire ou de facon plus ambivalente. Finalement, il termine avec une discussion portant sur le positionnement politique de ces femmes. Au cours de cet article, deux principaux arguments sont avances. Dans un premier temps alors que la litterature represente les membres de l’association comme des victimes de la dictature, cette etude demontre comment les identites ont plutot evolue au fil du temps et dependent lourdement du contexte socio-politique. Dans un second temps, il est egalement demontre que l’association a un certain pouvoir de circonscription sur ses membres relativement aux representations de soi et du passe qui doivent etre mis de l’avant. [This article looks at self-representation found among the members of the Association of Families of Detained-Disappeared as well as its influence on individual contemporary identities and social positioning. Employing the case of post-dictatorship Chile, it outlines how the disappearance of loved ones still influences the contemporary identities of relatives. By discussing the different identities present within this group, the article highlights how some of the members of the association represent themselves primarily as human rights activists whereas others see themselves as victims of an authoritarian regime, or in a more ambivalent way. Finally, it discusses how these women position themselves in contemporary Chilean politics. Throughout the article, two main arguments are advanced. First, where the literature generally represents them as victims of the dictatorship, this study shows that identities have evolved through time and depend heavily on the socio-political context. A second related argument is that the association has an influence on its membership to highlight certain self-representations and accounts of the past.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".