Bibliographic record
Abstract
A boriginal people have a long-established and strong connection with the land.Fire has been an historic and harmonious instrument that nurtured this close relationship.There is abundant documentation showing that Aboriginal people have used fire and prescribed burning for thousands of years.According to the late Henry T. Lewis, Anthropology Professor with the University of Alberta, "Indian traditional knowledge closely parallels what fire ecologists have told us for years and what has been rediscovered by modern forestry management" (Lewis 1978).Aboriginal people are intimately familiar with the effects of fires.An article written in 2004 by Tammy Allison and Henry Michel summarized the teachings of the late Annie Kruger, a former Okanagan Elder and Traditional Fire Keeper for the Penticton Indian Band, who led a workshop and field tour in November 2003.According to Elders,"The Okanagan [Syilx] People existed in a reciprocal relationship with the land.The land provides all foods, medicines, material goods, and shelter needed for survival; in return the Syilx are responsible to be caretakers of the land.This responsibility demands that we ensure all plant and animal communities have their food and that their shelter requirements are met.Fire has been a major component of this responsibility for Okanagans" (Allison & Michel 2004:7).Controlled burning is an accepted approach for ecosystem management worldwide.The Syilx nation has a tremendous amount of knowledge about their territory (Okanagan).Syilx knowledge keepers, in particular, are well-respected for their knowledge, especially when they do controlled and fuel load reduction burns in their territory.There are prayers and protocols that our ancestors used when doing the traditional burns, which are still carried out today (Richard Armstrong, personal communication, April 2012).In a 1999 article, Alan Anderson contrasts the systems of knowledge (Aboriginal vs. western science fire management).Most fires that are lit by people of colonial or European origin are "science-based, strategically directed and goal-oriented … aimed at achieving specific ecological outcomes (Anderson 1999:6).In contrast, Aboriginal people burn more out of "an emergent property, diffusely arising from many uses of fire that serves social, cultural, spiritual, as well as ecological needs" (Anderson 1999:6). 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".