Bibliographic record
Abstract
The movement for teachers' pensions in British Columbia gained little momentum until well into this century, but the problem of the destitute teacher existed from the beginnings of education in the province. Teachers, in fact, were not always considered necessary and thus could not hope to be well cared for even when they were able to work. According to the regulations of the Hudson's Bay Company in 1836, the father of the family was to be encouraged to devote his leisure hours to the education of his children, and the first school in the province of British Columbia was not established until 1846, when Vancouver Island became a crown colony. At that it was only a boarding school supported by the Company mainly to serve the children of Company employees. In 1852 a day school was set up, but this also was a private venture. Between 1853 and 1855 the Legislative Council built schools at Victoria, Craigflower, and Nanaimo, but all remained under the supervision of the chaplain of the Hudson's Bay Company. The first free common school was opened in 1865 at Esquimalt. The Common School Act was passed that year by the Legislative Assembly of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".