Movimientos (Trans) Feministas del Ecuador :El caso de la Marcha de la putas - Quito
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This document is the result of fieldwork conducted between 2014 and 2015 in the movement and action Slut Walk - Ecuador. This initiative was born in Canada in 2011, to reject sexist comments that blame women for rape upon them by the way they dress; and it has expanded around the world. In Ecuador’s case, its development is particularly interesting because it provides a political content that feeds feminism and transfeminism that is widely emerging through this, it is under construction and this is what caught my attention. For this, a research participant observation that allowed walk three categories of analysis (shafts sense, isotopies): Temporality, spatiality and meaning. Discourses and practices that support and supported by the patriarchal system in Ecuador has generated social mobilization to confront, however it is in a moment of transformation. This situation is not alien to feminism and activism but transfeminism presents the theoretical, practical an political contributions that are embodied in this movement and action Slutwalk - Ecuador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".