Some ectoparasites of the common rousette bat (Rousettus amplexicaudatus Geofroy, 1810) (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) from colonies in Batangas and Rizal, Philippines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colonies of the common rousette bat (Rousettus amplexicaudatus) from the provinces of Batangas and Rizal, Luzon, Philippines were examined for ectoparasites. Ectoparasites were collected and fxed and stored in 70% ethyl alcohol until further study. Collected specimens consisted of batfies, feas, mites and tick larvae. These were processed for examination by cleaning in 5% potassium hydroxide solution, washing in distilled water, dehydrating in increasing grades of ethyl alcohol, clearing in oil of cloves and mounting in Canada balsam. The ectoparasites were identifed as follows: Two species of batfies, Eucampsipoda sundaicum and Megastrebla parvior belonging to the families Streblidae and Nycteribidae, respectively; a species of fea, Thaumapsylla breviceps of the family Ceratophyllidae, two species of mites, Meristapis lateralis and Ancystropus zelleborii both belonging to the family Spinturnicidae and an undentifed tick larvae belonging to the family Ixodidae. Photographs of these species based on the present collection are provided. Keywords: Batfies, ectoparasites, fea, mite, Rousettus amplexicaudatus, Philippines
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".