MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548015641 · doi:10.1109/itng.2015.151

On Bias Corrected Estimators of the Two Parameter Gamma Distribution

2015· article· en· W1548015641 on OpenAlex
Ashok K. Singh, Anita Singh, Dennis J. Murphy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorSkewnessStatisticsMonte Carlo methodMathematicsGamma distributionMean squared errorDistribution (mathematics)M-estimatorMoment (physics)PhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gamma distribution, which is a member of Pearson Type III family of distributions, is one of the most commonly used distribution in engineering applications since it can be used as a probability model for positive data sets exhibiting various degrees of skewness. The maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of the two parameter gamma distribution are known to be biased, and bias-corrected estimators of the parameters are available in the literature. In this paper, we have used Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate the bias and mean squared error (MSE) of the moment estimators, the ML estimators, and bias-corrected ML estimators. Our simulations show that the bias-correction available in the literature fails to remove the bias in the MLE for small values of the shape parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it