MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548015641 · doi:10.1109/itng.2015.151

On Bias Corrected Estimators of the Two Parameter Gamma Distribution

2015· article· en· W1548015641 on OpenAlexaff
Ashok K. Singh, Anita Singh, Dennis J. Murphy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorSkewnessStatisticsMonte Carlo methodMathematicsGamma distributionMean squared errorDistribution (mathematics)M-estimatorMoment (physics)PhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gamma distribution, which is a member of Pearson Type III family of distributions, is one of the most commonly used distribution in engineering applications since it can be used as a probability model for positive data sets exhibiting various degrees of skewness. The maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of the two parameter gamma distribution are known to be biased, and bias-corrected estimators of the parameters are available in the literature. In this paper, we have used Monte-Carlo simulation to estimate the bias and mean squared error (MSE) of the moment estimators, the ML estimators, and bias-corrected ML estimators. Our simulations show that the bias-correction available in the literature fails to remove the bias in the MLE for small values of the shape parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.086
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.086
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207