MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1548063599 · doi:10.1029/2009gl041408

A GCM‐based analysis of circulation controls on <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O in the southwest Yukon, Canada: Implications for climate reconstructions in the region

2010· article· en· W1548063599 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert D. Field, G. W. K. Moore, G. Holdsworth, Gavin A. Schmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleoclimatologyPrecipitationClimatologyGCM transcription factorsGeologyAtmospheric circulationGeneral Circulation ModelGlacial periodClimate changePeriod (music)Atmospheric sciencesGeographyMeteorologyOceanographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve our understanding of paleoclimatic records in the southwest Yukon, we examined controls on precipitation δ18O using an isotopically‐equipped atmospheric general circulation model (GCM). Our results show that, particularly during the cool‐season, elevated δ18O is associated with a deeper Aleutian Low and stronger southerly moisture flow, while lower δ18O is associated with the opposite meteorological conditions. These results suggest that the large mid‐19th century shift towards lower δ18O values seen in paleoclimate records from the region was associated with a shift towards a weaker Aleutian Low. While in disagreement with a previous interpretation of this shift, it is consistent with records of glacial advance and tree‐ring growth during the same period, and observational studies of Aleutian Low controls on temperature and precipitation in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→