MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Detecção de Salmonella em alimentos crus de origem animal empregando os imunoensaios rápidos TECRATM Salmonella VIA, TECRATM Salmonella UNIQUE e o método convencional de cultura

2002· dissertation· pt· W1548138525 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Maria Ramalho de Paula

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsinVentiv Health Clinical
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalmonellaMicrobiologyBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A presença de Salmonella em 200 amostras de alimentos crus de origem animal foi investigada empregando-se os dois ensaios imunoenzimáticos rápidos TECRA™ Salmonella VIA e TECRA™ Salmonella UNIQUE (TECRA Diagnostics, Rosewille, NSW, Australia) e o método de cultura convencional empregado rotineiramente no Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, SP. Quarenta e cinco amostras (22.5%) foram Salmonella positivas por pelo menos um dos três métodos. O número de amostras positivas de acordo com o método analítico foi 34 (75,6%) para o método de cultura convencional, 29 (64,4%) para TECRA™ Salmonella VIA e 27 (60.0%) para TECRA™ Salmonella UNIQUE. O método de cultura convencional detectou quatro amostras positivas não detectadas por nenhum dos outros dois métodos rápidos. TECRA™ Salmonella UNIQUE detectou sete amostras positivas não detectadas pelos demais métodos. Uma amostra foi positiva apenas pelo método TECRA™ Salmonella VIA. Considerando todos os resultados (positivos e negativos) o teste de qui quadrado de McNemar indicou que as diferenças entre os resultados obtidos pelos métodos rápidos, quando comparados aos obtidos pelo método convencional, não foram estatisticamente significativas (p>0.05).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→