MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W154816514

Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures

2007· article· en· W154816514 on OpenAlex
Jennifer Tang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBloodlettingPortraitMedicineCourageSoulPsychoanalysisPresentation (obstetrics)SympathyPersonalityLiteraturePsychologyArt historyHistorySurgeryPsychiatryArtPhilosophyAlternative medicineTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Vincent Lam’s Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures is a collection of twelve short stories chronicling the lives of four physicians and the patients that they encounter. Bloodletting is an honest and revealing work, which entertains while challenging the reader to reflect on some of the ethical issues presented. The characters have strong initial presentation, but this falters towards the denouement. A scene in the anatomy lab introduces us to three of the protagonists as first-year medical students: Ming, the acerbic, scalpel-happy, left-brain dominant Type A personality, Sri, a sensitive soul who insists on naming the cadaver, and Chen, the peacekeeper who prevents Ming and Sri from vivisecting each other. Fitzgerald, the fourth protagonist, is a loner who uses alcohol to exorcise his demons. The first few stories provide the reader with portraits of these physicians in their youth, while the rest diverge into crossroads following their respective professional and personal lives. Bloodletting is an intensely personal piece that reflects the author’s experiences as a Toronto emergency physician, an Arctic research ship’s doctor, and a son of immigrants. One of the stories, A Long Migration, is based on the author’s experiences caring for his terminally ill grandfather. Dr. Lam paints poignant and often amusing sketches of the various lives touched by his protagonists; he does this most notably in Afterwards, with the embittered description of a recently widowed woman in search of the truth about her husband’s death. The most captivating aspect of Bloodletting is the author’s gift for describing his characters. In the care of his prose, Ming, Sri, Chen and Fitz are more than words on a page. As a reader, one already feels acquainted with the protagonists: they are your colleagues, friends, and classmates. The first three stories, introducing his characters as medical students, are his strongest: How to Get into Medical School Parts I and II, and Take All of Murphy. Dr. Lam breathes life into his characters by revealing their flaws, vulnerabilities and humanity. He allows the reader to become the character, suffering through the drama and anxieties they are faced with. One of the most memorable scenes is when the lovesick Fitzgerald imagines possible alternate endings to his romantic drama; the author describes this in a comical quasi-soap opera script format. The angst of applying to medical school is captured in a humorous and touching way: “They ate, clarified the puzzles of cell membrane physiology, and talked about their need to become physicians. Others were not genuine, they agreed, and transparently wanted to become doctors for money and prestige. Ming and Fitz wanted medicine for the right reasons, they told each other: service, humanity, giving. Because their motivations were clean, they were certain they deserved it more than those among them. They did not ask why they wanted to serve, be humane or to give. These simply felt like the right motivations and being correctly motivated should improve their chances of success. This was enough and these sentiments felt easy and immune from questioning.” The description of the students’ cadaver experience in Take all of Murphy is sure to stir memories of similar experiences in the minds of MJM readers. Dr. Lam skillfully intertwines various ethical questions throughout Bloodletting while still allowing his sense of humour and wit to shine through. As foreshadowed by the words of William Osler that the book begins with, the protagonists and their patients struggle with the fact that “Medicine is the science of uncertainty and the art of probability” (Osler). Although the early stories succeed in making the reader care about the characters, the latter half of Bloodletting does not live up to its full potential for character development. The second half reduces the complex features of some of the protagonists into two-dimensional forms. Ming, a fascinating multifaceted character, was given a brilliant exposition in the first story. Yet after this, she seems to be forgotten, her character left to languish without any development. She reappears briefly in An Insistent Tide, but mostly as background to another storyline. It seems a waste to see such an interesting character left behind. The gap that the reader feels in the latter half is testament to the strength of the early stories; I felt as if I had lost touch with four old friends after knowing them so well in the beginning. Regardless of this, Dr. Lam’s ability to convey moments and emotions makes this reading an enjoyable experience. Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures is a well-crafted work that offers fresh perspectives on medicine through the eyes and varied personalities of the characters. The reader is immersed in the world Dr. Lam has created through his short stories. Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures is accessible enough to appeal to non-medical audiences while still keeping seasoned health professionals engaged. It has great potential for use in medical education as a narrative that may spark interesting discussion of ethics and professionalism. In one of the stories, the author describes the thoughts of a character: “What would he be if not a doctor?” As a first novel, Bloodletting is proof that in addition to being a physician, Dr. Lam is an accomplished writer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it