MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548220767 · doi:10.18554/refacs.v1i1.606

A deficiência visual e o processo de construção da cidadania: um estudo no Instituto de Cegos do Brasil Central de Uberaba

2013· article· pt· W1548220767 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Família Ciclos de Vida e Saúde no Contexto Social · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo conhecer a realidade cotidiana dos deficientes visuais atendidos no Instituto de Cegos do Brasil Central de Uberaba-ICBC, analisando qual é o impacto que as atividades socioassistenciais, de habilitação e reabilitação desenvolvidas na referida instituição causam no processo de construção da cidadania dessas pessoas. Para tanto, utilizou-se a pesquisa documental e de campo, com a realização de entrevistas com cinco deficientes visuais que vivem na instituição em regime de internato e 10 que são atendidos em regime de externato. Os resultados demonstraram que as ações desenvolvidas possibilitam a inserção do deficiente visual na sociedade, melhoria da qualidade de vida, favorecendo o processo de construção da cidadania e conquista da autonomia.Descritores: Autonomia pessoal; Pessoas com deficiência visual; Serviço Social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it