Characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease with an onset before eight years of age: A multicenter epidemiological survey in <scp>J</scp>apan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been rare in Japan since the 1990s. The present study attempted to define the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of early-childhood IBD in Japan in comparison with results from Western countries. METHODS: Among children diagnosed as having IBD between January 1998 and December 2008, those showing onset before 8 years of age were investigated retrospectively. A questionnaire survey was carried out at 45 facilities throughout Japan, and 80 cases were reported from 27 facilities. On the basis of the final diagnosis, 24 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 47 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the patients with CD, the age at onset was less than 1 year in 62.5%. On the basis of the Montreal classification, 87.5% of CD cases involved the colon, and 63.8% of UC cases were pancolitis. Coexisting conditions such as congenital diseases (five cases) and cerebral palsy (four cases) were present before the onset of IBD. Growth failure was more severe (P < 0.05) at diagnosis in CD patients than in UC patients. Familial occurrence within first-degree relatives was observed in eight families among 45 patients with UC, compared with none among the CD patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that, in Japan, the pathogenesis of IBD in infants and children may differ from that in Western countries, and that the characteristics of early childhood-onset IBD are distinct from those of school age-onset IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".