Ressources naturelles, termes de l'echange et croissance du revenu reel au Canada : 1870 a 2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le present document etudie la croissance de l'economie des ressources au Canada et la contribution des gains d'echange qui decoulent de la hausse des termes de l'echange a la croissance du revenu reel de 1870 a 2010. Il comprend un historique de la croissance d'une succession de ressources naturelles examinant la production et les prix dans les secteurs de l'agriculture, de la foresterie, de l'extraction miniere, et du petrole et du gaz, de meme qu'un apercu de l'incidence de cette evolution sur le bien etre des Canadiens qui repose sur des estimations de la difference entre la croissance du revenu reel et celle du produit reel produites conformement au cadre de mesure du Systeme de comptabilite nationale pour evaluer les gains d'echange decoulant de la hausse des termes de l'echange au cours de la periode etudiee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".