MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548518550 · doi:10.1063/1.1477041

Sequential MCMC for spatial signal separation and restoration from an array of sensors

2002· article· en· W1548518550 on OpenAlex
William Ng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Particle filterAlgorithmSensor arrayMonte Carlo methodPosterior probabilityMatrix (chemical analysis)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsKalman filterStatisticsBayesian probabilityMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the implementation of sequential Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation, also known as particle filtering, to signal separation and restoration problems, using a passive array of sensors. This proposed method offers significant advantages: 1) the signals mixed at the array can be well-separated in space and restored in an online fashion, 2) the assumption of a stationary environment over the interval can be relaxed, 3) the estimated joint posterior distribution of all the unknown parameters can be used for statistical inference, and 4) the method can also be used to dynamically detect the number of signals throughout the observation period. The signals used in the simulation were mixed by a highly-nonlinear but structured steering-vector matrix. Simulation results demonstrated the effectiveness of the method in such a way that the true and restored signals were clearly separated and restored by the sequential MCMC method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it