Transcultural fictions and travels in cultural criticism.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Com um enfoque em obras de escritoras no Canadá e Brasil, este trabalho discute a noção de transculturalismo e a forma como as identidades gendradas são concebidas em um contexto de contatos culturais em um tempo e espaços específicos e como textos literários abordam esses temas. Argumento que a noção de transculturalismo, em suas várias definições, atravessa tempos e espaços, mas mantém inalteradas em seu cerne relações de poder assimétricas que em sua teorização tenta questionar e desestabilizar.Abstract: With a focus on the work by women writers in Canada and Brazil, this essav discusses the notion of transculturalism and how gender identities are conceived in a context of cultural intermingling in time and space and how literary texts tackle these issues. 1 argue that the notion of transculturalism, in its several hues and many possible definitions and concepts, traverses time and space but retains the asymmetrical relations of power that it theoretically often claims to question and undermine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.064 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".