MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548659075 · doi:10.1109/qels.2001.962241

Theory of relativistic harmonic generation

2002· article· en· W1548659075 on OpenAlexaff
Q‐Han Park, Robert W. Boyd, J. E. Sipe, Alexander L. Gaeta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMultipole expansionLambdaElectronDipoleAtomic physicsElectric fieldWavelengthIntensity (physics)Order (exchange)Quantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. In this paper, we show that the argument about vanishing THG breaks down under relativistic conditions. We consider the motion of a free electron in an intense laser field of wavelength /spl lambda/. For field strengths of the order of mc/sup 2///spl lambda/e, which for /spl lambda/=1 /spl mu/m corresponds to an intensity of the order of 2/spl times/10/sup 17/ W/cm/sup 2/, the electron is accelerated to relativistic velocities in a single optical period, and thus the excursion of the electron from its equilibrium position occurs over a distance of the order of /spl lambda/. Under such conditions, the radiation emitted by the electron cannot be described within the electric dipole approximation, and in fact cannot be well described by a multipole expansion for a finite number of terms. We instead calculate the intensity of the emitted radiation through the use of the Lenard-Wiechert potentials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207