MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548672224 · doi:10.1109/robot.1999.770359

On inverse kinematics and trajectory planning for tele-laparoscopic manipulation

2003· article· en· W1548672224 on OpenAlexaff
Shahram Payandeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersIntelligent Systems Center
KeywordsInverse kinematicsKinematicsTrajectoryComputer scienceRotation (mathematics)Manipulator (device)Kinematics equationsControl theory (sociology)SimulationRobot kinematicsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceRobotPhysicsMobile robotControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addresses the kinematic modelling, solutions and trajectory planning of a tele-laparoscopic manipulator. This type of manipulator can be used in remote positioning of laparoscopic tools through a tele-operating system. Specifically the paper models kinematics of a typical manipulating system which can be used in such tele-surgery. Inverse kinematics solutions are also obtained for two kinematically constrained motions which are part of a typical trajectory of the laparoscopic tools. These are fixed axis rotation of the tool and its straight line motion. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the validity of such models and solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207