MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548719679 · doi:10.5555/1357910.1357998

A formalization of global simulation models for continuous/discrete systems

2007· article· en· W1548719679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToolboxComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Synchronization (alternating current)Discrete event simulationSimulation languageTheoretical computer scienceSimulation modelingContinuous modellingDistributed computingFormal verificationSystems simulationDiscrete modellingDiscrete systemProgramming languageSimulationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many of the modern systems integrate components specific to different application domains. Frequently these systems combine continuous and discrete sub-systems and therefore their design involves solving specific global modeling and simulation problems. This paper addresses the formal representation of a continuous/discrete global synchronization model and the corresponding simulation interfaces. This representation enables the definition of generic language independent co-simulation tools that can be used to provide global simulation models for continuous/discrete heterogeneous systems. The model was validated through simulation, using UPPAAL toolbox and its verification was realized by defining and checking the main properties. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207