MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548756299 · doi:10.4000/etudesafricaines.154

Entre engagement et allégeance

2002· article· fr· W1548756299 on OpenAlexaff
Tarik Dahou

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d études africaines · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Historical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyVisionPolitical scienceArtAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À partir du cas particulier du Sénégal, ce texte s’attache à présenter une approche alternative aux visions fonctionnelles appliquées à l’étude des systèmes clientélistes contemporains. La critique des théories rationalistes est effectuée à partir d’une analyse de la généalogie du concept de factionnalisme et d’un terrain réalisé dans le delta du Fleuve Sénégal. Au niveau local, les allégeances politiques s’avèrent tributaires d’alliances historiques et affectives qui déterminent davantage les coalitions politiques que l’intérêt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.045
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d études africainesSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207