Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trois livres écrits à chaud au printemps et à l’été 2012 fournissent l’occasion et le moyen de scruter la manière dont le Printemps québécois s’est lui-même mis en images et en mots : témoignages, parfois sous le mode de la poésie, du dessin et de la fiction ; textes et images de création, parfois sous le mode du témoignage ; ensemble, ils ouvrent une fenêtre sur ce Printemps et permettent de le saisir de l’intérieur, de l’aborder en tant que mouvement dans sa globalité et sa complexité, de saisir l’imaginaire qui y est à l’oeuvre, et surtout de le faire rétrospectivement. Seront mis en évidence les sujets individuels et le sujet collectif au coeur du Printemps québécois ainsi que les figures de leur adversaire, puis le passage du Je au Nous – des sujets individuels au sujet collectif – ce qui permettra de cerner tant la mémoire que le projet dont ce mouvement est porteur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".