MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1548829356

Branching fractions for chi(cJ) -> p(p)over-bar pi(0), p(p)over-bar eta, and p(p)over-bar omega

2010· article· en· W1548829356 on OpenAlexfundno aff
P. U. E. Onyisi, J. L. Rosner, J. Alexander, D. G. Cassel, S. J. Das, R. Ehrlich, L. Fields, L. Gibbons, S. W. Gray, D. L. Hartill, B. K. Heltsley, J. M. Hunt, D. L. Kreinick, В. Е. Кузнецов, James Ledoux, J. R. Patterson, D. Peterson, D. Riley, A. Ryd, A. J. Sadoff, X. Shi, W. Sun, J. Yelton, P. Rubin, N. Lowrey, S. Mehrabyan, M. Selen, J. Wiss, S. Adams, M. Kornicer, R. E. Mitchell, M. R. Shepherd, C. M. Tarbert, D. Besson, T. K. Pedlar, J. Xavier, D. Cronin-Hennessy, J. Hietala, P. Zweber, S. Dobbs, Z. Metreveli, K. K. Seth, Ting‐Hui Xiao, A. Tomaradze, S. Brisbane, J. Libby, L. M. Garcia Martin, A. Powell, P. Spradlin, G. Wilkinson, H. Méndez, Jun Ge, D. H. Miller, I. P. J. Shipsey, B. Xin, G. S. Adams, D. Hu, B. Moziak, J. Napolitano, K. M. Ecklund, J. Insler, H. Muramatsu, C. S. Park, E. H. Thorndike, F. Yang, S. Ricciardi, C. Thomas, M. Artuso, S. Blusk, R. Mountain, T. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang, L. M. Zhang, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, A. Lincoln, Mark J. Smith, Peng Zhou, J. Zhu, P. Naik, J. H. Rademacker, D. M. Asner, K. W. Edwards, Jason W. Reed, K. Randrianarivony, Arianne Robichaud, G. Tatishvili, E. J. White, R. A. Briere, H. Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesTheologyCombinatoricsPhilosophyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a sample of 25.9 x 10(6) psi(2S) decays acquired with the CLEO-c detector at the CESR e(+)e(-) collider, we report branching fractions for the decays chi(cJ) -> p (p) over bar pi(0), p (p) over bar eta, and p (p) over bar omega, with J = 0, 1, 2. Our results for B(chi(cJ) -> p (p) over bar pi(0)) and B(chi(cJ) -> p (p) over bar eta) are consistent with, but more precise than, previous measurements. Furthermore, we include the first measurement of B(chi(cJ) -> p (p) over bar omega).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207