L’intervention ergonomique comme acte pédagogique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La pratique de l’ergonomie est un champ de recherche qui permet depuis une vingtaine d’années, de produire des connaissances utiles à l’élaboration de démarches d’intervention et, par conséquent, utiles à la formation des ergonomes. À partir d’un modèle décrivant les registres possibles de l’échange en pédagogie, et insistant sur les liens possibles entre l’intervenant, les apprenants et les savoirs, nous tentons de montrer l’intérêt de puiser dans le creuset des sciences de l’éducation pour comprendre et structurer des démarches d’intervention en ergonomie. Sur la base de 3 interventions différentes, les résultats que nous obtenons nous permettent, non seulement, d’admettre qu’il existe une dimension pédagogique dans l’intervention ergonomique, mais aussi, d’explorer des possibilités de structurer l’intervention compte tenu des objectifs pédagogiques que l’on pourrait se fixer en tant qu’ergonome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.022 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".