MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1549087584

Castorf staging limonov: trangression and neo-totalitarianism at the Berliner Volksbühne

2014· article· es· W1549087584 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Korte

Bibliographic record

VenueDipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2008, German director, Frank Castorf, staged an adaptation of Eduard Limonov's 1979 novel Fuck Off, Amerika. Limonov's novel scandalized audiences with its description of capitalist excess and nihilism by detailing the exploits of a Soviet dissident in New York City. Castorf's adaptation aligns itself with Limonov's critique of both the socialist and capitalist projects, and reinforces the political line of his own theatre, the Berliner Volksbühne. The production centralizes around the novel's protagonist Eddie (Eduard Limonov's alter-ego), maximizing on Limonov's real-life biography as leader of the extremist National Bolshevik Party in Russia. Both Castorf and Limonov delineate the ideological fantasies of former socialist regimes as a postsocialist performance of politics. As this depiction is reliant on Limonov's political involvement in real zones of war and conflict, both artists use questionable means to mark geo-political terrains where 'Americanization' and neo-liberalism have not firmly taken root. As such, the production represents the attempt to perpetuate a struggle against the Western 'colonization' of the former East, which was most vibrant in the immediate years after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)Same topicGerman History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207